Preventing Floods, Fires Requires Local Control
By Rep. Clint Owlett (R-Tioga/Bradford)
The devastating footage coming out of California creates lasting images in my mind, as I’m sure it does in yours. The loss of life, homes, businesses and schools, and the environmental effects, are staggering. At the same time, I’m equally impacted by the images of people coming together to help in a time of need. It reminded me of how our community pulled together after the devastating floods in our region back in August.
After every natural disaster there must be a concerted effort to reevaluate the decisions leading up to the event. While the magnitude of floods, hurricanes and wildfires may make us feel nothing can be done, I personally reject that notion.
I’m reminded of how New York got to work cleaning out its streams directly after the August flood to create the volume needed for a significant storm that will most certainly happen. New York Gov. Kathy Hochul took decisive action to make sure she was protecting lives and livelihoods in her state. She challenged the current environmental practices and pointed out the impact of several decades of not allowing local governments and landowners to protect their homes and property. And then she got to work with commonsense, meaningful maintenance.
In the name of protecting the environment and science, are we actually in a worse position? If you talk with the previous generation of leaders in my area, the answer is a resounding YES! If you talk with the previous generations of leaders in California who built firebreaks and maintained water supply, I bet they would also agree.
While I may not have all the answers, I do know this. It’s a crying shame that entire communities have to worry about a one-inch rainstorm flooding their home, business or farm in the name of protecting the environment. Our local officials can and should be able to lead and get the job done.
Could the answer be very simple? Give local community leaders the resources and tell the bureaucrats to support them, not restrict them. Could the answer be to give county elected officials the lease and royalty money that has been collected from under the very streams that need to be maintained, as I have proposed in House Bill 88? What about allowing the state and local governments the ability to assure a creek is actually hitting a bridge or other structure the way it was engineered to take water, as I have suggested in House Bill 200 of last session (soon to be reintroduced)? One thing I do know is money without significant policy and oversight flexibility will not work.
Like our region, the communities in California affected by this catastrophe will pull together and rebuild, but not after devastating loss of life and precious belongings. While our communities are still in a bad spot and New York is ready, we can only hope California leaders will see the need to refocus on actually being prepared for tragic events that will inevitably continue to happen. Just like protecting our communities from flooding, those could be long-term and very involved projects. But some of them may also be as simple as using good, sound, commonsense judgment calls. The problem is that common sense is not all that common anymore.